[CI] Protest and my TemperTantrum

[Evan Roberts]

If the rule is changed, it most certainly will be called the "Pissing Boy
rule".

As an interim solution, try to have common English translations as
acceptable answers.
------------------------------
From: Kerry Lawson <kerry_lawson at sympatico.ca>
Sent: ‎2015-‎06-‎24 5:04 PM
To: inquisition at cfaj.ca
Subject: Re: [CI] Protest and my TemperTantrum

 I agree with Mark and Theresa. and with Theresa that this is the "snooze
you lose" rule.

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:13:52 -0400
From: theresa.polyakov at gmail.com
To: inquisition at cfaj.ca
Subject: Re: [CI] Protest and my TemperTantrum

I agree with Mark on this.

If you felt strongly enough you would have protested. When you had the
chance.

We have lost out a few times in just the past few games for not protesting
but lines need to be drawn somewhere.

Can we call that rule "snooze you lose"?

Cheers
Theresa
On Jun 24, 2015 4:07 PM, "Mark Brader" <msb at vex.net> wrote:

> So how about a rule that if a
> protest is accepted, people who answered the question right (as per
> accepted protest) should get the appropriate number of points for it?

In fact we already have the opposite as an explicit rule (rule C9,
point 3):  "Protests made at one game do not affect the scoring of
other games".

I and my team have been bitten by this situation more than once over
the years, but it really is a more practical rule.  Protests need
to be recorded while it's fresh in everyone's mind exactly what
was said.  It may take days after a protest, sometimes even longer,
before a ruling is issued and players hear about it.  If people
then make delayed protests on the basis of the ruling, they may not
remember exactly what happened, and if the delayed protest involves a
judgment call such as "close enough?", that can take even more time.

A further issue is that when the league statistician issues the stats
with "all protests resolved", it means people will know that they're
correct.  Allowing a delayed protest could alter the result of a game,
maybe even affect who gets in the Final.

So I say keep the present rule.
--
Mark Brader | "No, I'm disagreeing with you.  That doesn't mean I'm not
msb at vex.net |  listening to you or understanding what you're saying:
Toronto     |  I'm doing all three at the same time."   -- Aaron Sorkin

_______________________________________________
Inquisition mailing list
Inquisition at cfaj.ca
http://cfaj.ca/mailman/listinfo/inquisition_cfaj.ca


_______________________________________________ Inquisition mailing list
Inquisition at cfaj.ca http://cfaj.ca/mailman/listinfo/inquisition_cfaj.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cfaj.ca/pipermail/inquisition_cfaj.ca/attachments/20150624/e7a3bc13/attachment-0003.html>