[CI] Game 4 report and stats

[Greg Ioannou]

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Mark Brader <msb at vex.net> wrote:
>> All fixed. Any other corrections?
>
> Yes, there's the impossible protest ruling in Game 3, which I reported
> on October 22 (to Chris and to 5guys at cfaj.ca, instead of bothering the
> entire Inquisition mailing list with it as everyone else seems to have
> been doing).
>
> Game 3, Round 10, Question D1, the rulings were given as:
>
> |     Cellar Rats, Hal, for 2
> |     Answered "Hurricane/Hurricane wind speed"
> |     "That's what 'strength' is measured by."
> |
> |     What She Said, Greg, for 2
> |     Answered "Wind strength"
> |
> |     Usual Suspects, Harvey, for 1
> |     Answered "Wind speed"
> |
> |     Protests ACCEPTED
>
> Two protests cannot be accepted on the same question in the same game!
> (Rule C6 if you want to look it up.)  If Greg's "wind strength" is
> accepted then Harvey's protest is moot.  And then the game score is
> shown in the report as 66-61, and according to my game notes that's
> what it would have been if *neither* protest had been accepted.
>
> And the Game 4 report shows What She Said with 224 cumulative points
> and Usual Suspects with 222, which is still what it would be of Game 3
> had been 66-61.

As well, I'm credited with two 2s for that game. I would have three if
my protest had been accepted.

The game score should be 68-61 if my protest was accepted.

Greg